Abstract
It is rare for the forecasts of one economic forecasting model to always be more accurate than the forecasts from an alternative model. This suggests the possibility of implementing a switching strategy that chooses, at each point in time, the forecasting model that is expected to be most accurate conditional on a set of instruments that are used to track the relative accuracy of the underlying forecasts. The authors analyze the factors determining the expected gains from such a switching rule over a strategy of always using one of the underlying forecasts. The authors derive bounds on the expected gains from switching for both the nested and non-nested cases and also analyze the case with a highly persistent (near-unit root) predictor variable.