Abstract
Food or taste preference tests are analogous to naturalistic decisions in which the animal selects which stimuli to sample and for how long to sample them. The data acquired in such tests, the relative amounts of the alternative stimuli that are sampled and consumed, indicate the preference for each. While such preferences are typically recorded as a single quantity, an analysis of the ongoing sampling dynamics producing the preference can reveal otherwise hidden aspects of the decision-making process that depend on its underlying neural circuit mechanisms. Here, we perform a dynamic analysis of two factors that give rise to preferences in a two-alternative task, namely the distribution of durations of sampling bouts of each stimulus and the likelihood of returning to the same stimulus or switching to the alternative—that is, the transition probability—following each bout. The results of our analysis support a specific computational model of decision making whereby an exponential distribution of bout durations has a mean that is positively correlated with the palatability of that stimulus but also negatively correlated with the palatability of the alternative. This impact of the alternative stimulus on the distribution of bout durations decays over a timescale of tens of seconds, even though the memory of the alternative stimulus lasts far longer—long enough to impact the transition probabilities upon ending bouts. Together, our findings support a state transition model for bout durations and suggest a separate memory mechanism for stimulus selection. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved) (Source: journal abstract)