Abstract
Understanding mechanisms of resistance to antiviral inhibitors can reveal nuanced features of targeted viral mechanisms and, in turn, lead to improved strategies for inhibitor design. Arbidol is a broad-spectrum antiviral that binds to and prevents the fusion-associated conformational changes in the trimeric influenza A virus (IAV) hemagglutinin (HA). The rate-limiting step during the HA-mediated membrane fusion is the release of the hydrophobic fusion peptides from a conserved pocket on HA. Here, we investigated how destabilizing or stabilizing mutations in or near the fusion peptide affect viral sensitivity to Arbidol. The degree of sensitivity was proportional to the extent of fusion-peptide stability on the prefusion HA: stabilized mutants were more sensitive, and destabilized ones were resistant to Arbidol. Single-virion membrane fusion experiments for representative wild-type (WT) and mutant viruses demonstrated that resistance is a direct consequence of fusion-peptide destabilization not requiring reduced Arbidol binding to HA. Our results support the model whereby the probability of individual HAs extending to engage the target membrane is determined by the composite of two critical forces: a "tug " on the fusion peptide by HA rearrangements near the Arbidol binding site and the key interactions stabilizing the fusion peptide in the prefusion pocket. Arbidol increases and destabilizing mutations decrease the free-energy cost for fusion-peptide release, accounting for the observed resistance. Our findings have broad implications for fusion inhibitor design, viral mechanisms of resistance, and our basic understanding of HA-mediated membrane fusion.