Abstract
A shortened analog of gramicidin A has been shown by Urry et al. (Biochim. Biophys. Acta 775, 115–119) to have lower conductance than native gramicidin A. They argue this suggests that the major current carrier is the doubly occupied channel. A different perspective is presented here. Channel formation does not alter bilayer width. In a shortened channel an ion approaching the binding site moves further toward the center of the lipid-pore system. The electrostatic contribution to the energy barrier near the constriction mouth is greater for the shorter channel. As long as entry to the channel is rate limiting singly occupied short channels should exhibit lower conductance. The data are not inconsistent with singly occupied channels being the major current carriers. Experiments on other gramicidin analogs are suggested to more clearly distinguish between singly and doubly occupied channels as the dominant conducting species.