Hongfu Liu

Data-centric learning seeks to improve model performance from the perspective of data quality, and has been drawing increasing attention in the machine learning community. Among its key tools, influence functions provide a powerful framework to quantify the impact of individual training samples on model predictions, enabling practitioners to identify detrimental samples and retrain models on a cleaner dataset for improved performance. However, most existing work focuses on the question: "what data benefits the learning model?" In this paper, we take a step further and investigate a more fundamental question: "what is the performance ceiling of the learning model?" Unlike prior studies that primarily measure improvement through overall accuracy, we emphasize category-wise accuracy and aim for Pareto improvements, ensuring that every class benefits, rather than allowing tradeoffs where some classes improve at the expense of others. To address this challenge, we propose category-wise influence functions and introduce an influence vector that quantifies the impact of each training sample across all categories. Leveraging these influence vectors, we develop a principled criterion to determine whether a model can still be improved, and further design a linear programming-based sample reweighting framework to achieve Pareto performance improvements. Through extensive experiments on synthetic datasets, vision, and text benchmarks, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in estimating and achieving a model's performance improvement across multiple categories of interest.

Active learning strategically selects informative unlabeled data points and queries their ground truth labels for model training. The prevailing assumption underlying this machine learning paradigm is that acquiring these ground truth labels will optimally enhance model performance. However, this assumption may not always hold true or maximize learning capacity, particularly considering the costly labor annotations required for ground truth labels. In contrast to traditional ground truth labeling, this paper proposes salutary labeling, which automatically assigns the most beneficial labels to the most informative samples without human annotation. Specifically, we utilize the influence function, a tool for estimating sample influence, to select newly added samples and assign their salutary labels by choosing the category that maximizes their positive influence. This process eliminates the need for human annotation. Extensive experiments conducted on nine benchmark datasets demonstrate the superior performance of our salutary labeling approach over traditional active learning strategies. Additionally, we provide several in-depth explorations and practical applications of large language model (LLM) fine-tuning.

Shapley value-based data valuation methods, originating from cooperative game theory, quantify the usefulness of each individual sample by considering its contribution to all possible training subsets. Despite their extensive applications, these methods encounter the challenge of value inflation - while samples with negative Shapley values are detrimental, some with positive values can also be harmful. This challenge prompts two fundamental questions: the suitability of zero as a threshold for distinguishing detrimental from beneficial samples and the determination of an appropriate threshold. To address these questions, we focus on KNN-Shapley and propose Calibrated KNN-Shapley (CKNN-Shapley), which calibrates zero as the threshold to distinguish detrimental samples from beneficial ones by mitigating the negative effects of small-sized training subsets. Through extensive experiments, we demonstrate the effectiveness of CKNN-Shapley in alleviating data valuation inflation, detecting detrimental samples, and assessing data quality. We also extend our approach beyond conventional classification settings, applying it to diverse and practical scenarios such as learning with mislabeled data, online learning with stream data, and active learning for label annotation.

Influence functions serve as crucial tools for assessing sample influence in model interpretation, subset training set selection, noisy label detection, and more. By employing the first-order Taylor extension, influence functions can estimate sample influence without the need for expensive model retraining. However, applying influence functions directly to deep models presents challenges, primarily due to the non-convex nature of the loss function and the large size of model parameters. This difficulty not only makes computing the inverse of the Hessian matrix costly but also renders it non-existent in some cases. Various approaches, including matrix decomposition, have been explored to expedite and approximate the inversion of the Hessian matrix, with the aim of making influence functions applicable to deep models. In this paper, we revisit a specific, albeit naive, yet effective approximation method known as TracIn. This method substitutes the inverse of the Hessian matrix with an identity matrix. We provide deeper insights into why this simple approximation method performs well. Furthermore, we extend its applications beyond measuring model utility to include considerations of fairness and robustness. Finally, we enhance TracIn through an ensemble strategy. To validate its effectiveness, we conduct experiments on synthetic data and extensive evaluations on noisy label detection, sample selection for large language model fine-tuning, and defense against adversarial attacks.

Influence functions offer a robust framework for assessing the impact of each training data sample on model predictions, serving as a prominent tool in data-centric learning. Despite their widespread use in various tasks, the strong convexity assumption on the model and the computational cost associated with calculating the inverse of the Hessian matrix pose constraints, particularly when analyzing large deep models. This paper focuses on a classical data-centric scenario--trimming detrimental samples--and addresses both challenges within a unified framework. Specifically, we establish an equivalence transformation between identifying detrimental training samples via influence functions and outlier gradient detection. This transformation not only presents a straightforward and Hessian-free formulation but also provides profound insights into the role of the gradient in sample impact. Moreover, it relaxes the convexity assumption of influence functions, extending their applicability to non-convex deep models. Through systematic empirical evaluations, we first validate the correctness of our proposed outlier gradient analysis on synthetic datasets and then demonstrate its effectiveness in detecting mislabeled samples in vision models, selecting data samples for improving performance of transformer models for natural language processing, and identifying influential samples for fine-tuned Large Language Models.

Large Language models (LLMs) possess the capability to engage In-context Learning (ICL) by leveraging a few demonstrations pertaining to a new downstream task as conditions. However, this particular learning paradigm suffers from high instability stemming from substantial variances induced by factors such as the input distribution of selected examples, their ordering, and prompt formats. In this work, we demonstrate that even when all these factors are held constant, the random selection of examples still results in high variance. Consequently, we aim to explore the informative ability of data examples by quantifying the Information Gain (IG) obtained in prediction after observing a given example candidate. Then we propose to sample those with maximum IG. Additionally, we identify the presence of template bias, which can lead to unfair evaluations of IG during the sampling process. To mitigate this bias, we introduce Calibration Before Sampling strategy. The experimental results illustrate that our proposed method can yield an average relative improvement of 14.3% across six classification tasks using three LLMs.

Fair graph partition of social networks is a crucial step toward ensuring fair and non-discriminatory treatments in unsupervised user analysis. Current fair partition methods typically consider node balance, a notion pursuing a proportionally balanced number of nodes from all demographic groups, but ignore the bias induced by imbalanced edges in each cluster. To address this gap, we propose a notion edge balance to measure the proportion of edges connecting different demographic groups in clusters. We analyze the relations between node balance and edge balance, then with line graph transformations, we propose a co-embedding framework to learn dual node and edge fairness-aware representations for graph partition. We validate our framework through several social network datasets and observe balanced partition in terms of both nodes and edges along with good utility. Moreover, we demonstrate our fair partition can be used as pseudo labels to facilitate graph neural networks to behave fairly in node classification and link prediction tasks.

Automatic Pronunciation Assessment (APA) is vital for computer-assisted language learning. Prior methods rely on annotated speech-text data to train Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) models or speech-score data to train regression models. In this work, we propose a novel zero-shot APA method based on the pre-trained acoustic model, HuBERT. Our method involves encoding speech input and corrupting them via a masking module. We then employ the Transformer encoder and apply k-means clustering to obtain token sequences. Finally, a scoring module is designed to measure the number of wrongly recovered tokens. Experimental results on speechocean762 demonstrate that the proposed method achieves comparable performance to supervised regression baselines and outperforms non-regression baselines in terms of Pearson Correlation Coefficient (PCC). Additionally, we analyze how masking strategies affect the performance of APA.

Many research efforts have been committed to unsupervised domain adaptation (DA) problems that transfer knowledge learned from a labeled source domain to an unlabeled target domain. Various DA methods have achieved remarkable results recently in terms of predicting ability, which implies the effectiveness of the aforementioned knowledge transferring. However, state-of-the-art methods rarely probe deeper into the transferred mechanism, leaving the true essence of such knowledge obscure. Recognizing its importance in the adaptation process, we propose an interpretive model of unsupervised domain adaptation, as the first attempt to visually unveil the mystery of transferred knowledge. Adapting the existing concept of the prototype from visual image interpretation to the DA task, our model similarly extracts shared information from the domain-invariant representations as prototype vectors. Furthermore, we extend the current prototype method with our novel prediction calibration and knowledge fidelity preservation modules, to orientate the learned prototypes to the actual transferred knowledge. By visualizing these prototypes, our method not only provides an intuitive explanation for the base model's predictions but also unveils transfer knowledge by matching the image patches with the same semantics across both source and target domains. Comprehensive experiments and in-depth explorations demonstrate the efficacy of our method in understanding the transferred mechanism and its potential in downstream tasks including model diagnosis.

Generalized Zero-Shot Learning (GZSL) and Open-Set Recognition (OSR) are two mainstream settings that greatly extend conventional visual object recognition. However, the limitations of their problem settings are not negligible. The novel categories in GZSL require pre-defined semantic labels, making the problem setting less realistic; the oversimplified unknown class in OSR fails to explore the innate fine-grained and mixed structures of novel categories. In light of this, we are motivated to consider a new problem setting named Zero-Knowledge Zero-Shot Learning (ZK-ZSL) that assumes no prior knowledge of novel classes and aims to classify seen and unseen samples and recover semantic attributes of the fine-grained novel categories for further interpretation. To achieve this, we propose a novel framework that recovers the clustering structures of both seen and unseen categories where the seen class structures are guided by source labels. In addition, a structural alignment loss is designed to aid the semantic learning of unseen categories with their recovered structures. Experimental results demonstrate our method's superior performance in classification and semantic recovery on four benchmark datasets.