Jeff Gelles

Transcription activators trigger transcript production by RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) via the Mediator coactivator complex. Here, the dynamics of activator, Mediator, and RNAPII binding at promoter DNA were analyzed using multi-wavelength single-molecule microscopy of fluorescently labeled proteins in budding yeast nuclear extract. Binding of Mediator and RNAPII to the template required an activator and an upstream activating sequence (UAS) but not a core promoter. While Mediator and RNAPII sometimes bind as a pre-formed complex, more commonly Mediator binds first and subsequently recruits RNAPII to form a pre-initiation complex precursor (pre-PIC) tethered to activators on the UAS. Interestingly, Mediator occupancy has a highly non-linear response to activator concentration, and fluorescence intensity measurements show that Mediator preferentially associates with templates having at least two activators bound. Statistical mechanical modeling suggests this "synergy" is not due to cooperative binding between activators but instead occurs when multiple DNA-bound activator molecules simultaneously interact with a single Mediator.

During origin licensing, the origin recognition complex (ORC) loads two Mcm2-7 helicases onto DNA in a head-to-head conformation, establishing the foundation for subsequent bidirectional replication. Single-molecule experiments support a helicase-loading model in which one ORC loads both Mcm2-7 helicases at origins. For this to occur, ORC must release from its initial Mcm2-7 and DNA binding sites, flip over the helicase, and bind the opposite end of the Mcm2-7 complex and adjacent DNA to form the MO complex. Importantly, this binding-site transition occurs without ORC releasing into solution. Using a single-molecule FRET assay, we show that the N-terminal half of Orc6 tethers ORC to the N-terminal region of Mcm2 during ORC's binding-site transition. This interaction involves both the folded Orc6 N-terminal domain (Orc6N) and the adjacent unstructured linker and forms before ORC releases from its initial Mcm2-7 interaction. The absence of this interaction increases the rate of ORC release into solution, consistent with a tethering function. CDK phosphorylation of ORC inhibits the tethering interaction, providing a mechanism for the known CDK inhibition of MO complex formation. Interestingly, we identify mutations in the Orc6 linker region that support MO complex formation but prevent double-hexamer formation by inhibiting stable second Mcm2-7 recruitment. Our study provides a molecular explanation for a one-ORC mechanism of helicase loading and demonstrates that Orc6 is involved in multiple stages of origin licensing.

Hsp90 chaperones are a long-standing cancer drug target with numerous ATP-competitive inhibitors in clinical trials. Client proteins are transferred from Hsp70 to Hsp90 in a stepwise process of client delivery, loading, and trapping, but little is known about how inhibitors influence these steps. By examining the ER-resident BiP/Grp94 system (Hsp70/Hsp90 paralogs), we discover that some inhibitors allow BiP to push Grp94 into the client loading conformation, whereas other inhibitors block this conformational change and destabilize a BiP/client/Grp94 ternary complex. We uncover how BiP drives Grp94 into the client loading state and identify a structural explanation for why only a select group of inhibitors disrupt client loading on Grp94. These results show a client loading mechanism with specific shared features between the Hsp70/Hsp90 systems in the ER and cytosol and open a new avenue for rational Hsp90 drug design.
Hsp90 chaperones are a significant target for cancer drug development. Here the authors find that some Hsp90 inhibitors are compatible with a partially closed conformation of Grp94 that can accept the client protein from BiP, while others prevent this conformational change and destabilize the BiP-Grp94-client complex.

Transcription activators are said to stimulate gene expression by 'recruiting' coactivators, yet this vague term fits multiple kinetic models. To directly analyze the dynamics of activator-coactivator interactions, single-molecule microscopy was used to image promoter DNA, a transcription activator and the Spt-Ada-Gcn5 acetyltransferase (SAGA) complex within yeast nuclear extract. SAGA readily but transiently binds nucleosome-free DNA without an activator, while chromatin association occurs primarily when an activator is present. On both templates, an activator increases SAGA association rates by an order of magnitude and dramatically extends occupancy time. These effects reflect sustained interactions with the transactivation domain, as VP16 or Rap1 activation domains produce different SAGA dynamics. SAGA preferentially associates with templates carrying more than one activator. Unexpectedly, SAGA binding is substantially improved by nucleoside triphosphates but not histone H3 or H4 tail tetra-acetylations. Thus, we observe two modes of SAGA-template interaction: short-lived activator-independent binding to non-nucleosomal DNA and tethering to promoter-bound transcription activators for up to several minutes.Transcription activators are said to stimulate gene expression by 'recruiting' coactivators, yet this vague term fits multiple kinetic models. To directly analyze the dynamics of activator-coactivator interactions, single-molecule microscopy was used to image promoter DNA, a transcription activator and the Spt-Ada-Gcn5 acetyltransferase (SAGA) complex within yeast nuclear extract. SAGA readily but transiently binds nucleosome-free DNA without an activator, while chromatin association occurs primarily when an activator is present. On both templates, an activator increases SAGA association rates by an order of magnitude and dramatically extends occupancy time. These effects reflect sustained interactions with the transactivation domain, as VP16 or Rap1 activation domains produce different SAGA dynamics. SAGA preferentially associates with templates carrying more than one activator. Unexpectedly, SAGA binding is substantially improved by nucleoside triphosphates but not histone H3 or H4 tail tetra-acetylations. Thus, we observe two modes of SAGA-template interaction: short-lived activator-independent binding to non-nucleosomal DNA and tethering to promoter-bound transcription activators for up to several minutes.

Following transcript release during intrinsic termination, Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP) often remains associated with DNA in a post-termination complex (PTC). RNAPs in PTCs are removed from the DNA by the SWI2/SNF2 adenosine triphosphatase (ATPase) RapA. Here we determined PTC structures on negatively supercoiled DNA and with RapA engaged to dislodge the PTC. We found that core RNAP in the PTC can unwind DNA and initiate RNA synthesis but is prone to producing R-loops. Nucleotide binding to RapA triggers a conformational change that opens the RNAP clamp, allowing DNA in the RNAP cleft to reanneal and dissociate. We show that RapA helps to control cytotoxic R-loop formation in vivo, likely by disrupting PTCs. We suggest that analogous ATPases acting on PTCs to suppress transcriptional noise and R-loop formation may be widespread. These results hold importance for the bacterial transcription cycle and highlight a role for RapA in maintaining genome stability.

DNA transcription initiates after an RNA polymerase (RNAP) molecule binds to the promoter of a gene. In bacteria, the canonical picture is that RNAP comes from the cytoplasmic pool of freely diffusing RNAP molecules. Recent experiments suggest the possible existence of a separate pool of polymerases, competent for initiation, which freely slide on the DNA after having terminated one round of transcription. Promoter-dependent transcription reinitiation from this pool of posttermination RNAP may lead to coupled initiation at nearby operons, but it is unclear whether this can occur over the distance and timescales needed for it to function widely on a bacterial genome in vivo. Here, we mathematically model the hypothesized reinitiation mechanism as a diffusion-to-capture process and compute the distances over which significant interoperon coupling can occur and the time required. These quantities depend on molecular association and dissociation rate constants between DNA, RNAP, and the transcription initiation factor σ 70 ; we measure these rate constants using single-molecule experiments in vitro. Our combined theory/experimental results demonstrate that efficient coupling can occur at physiologically relevant σ 70 concentrations and on timescales appropriate for transcript synthesis. Coupling is efficient over terminator–promoter distances up to ∼1,000 bp, which includes the majority of terminator–promoter nearest neighbor pairs in the Escherichia coli genome. The results suggest a generalized mechanism that couples the transcription of nearby operons and breaks the paradigm that each binding of RNAP to DNA can produce at most one messenger RNA.

During origin licensing, the eukaryotic replicative helicase Mcm2-7 forms head-to-head double hexamers to prime origins for bidirectional replication. Recent single-molecule and structural studies revealed that one molecule of the helicase loader ORC (origin recognition complex) can sequentially load two Mcm2-7 hexamers to ensure proper head-to-head helicase alignment. To perform this task, ORC must release from its initial high-affinity DNA-binding site and “flip” to bind a weaker, inverted DNA site. However, the mechanism of this binding-site switch remains unclear. In this study, we used single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer to study the changing interactions between DNA and ORC or Mcm2-7. We found that the loss of DNA bending that occurs during DNA deposition into the Mcm2-7 central channel increases the rate of ORC dissociation from DNA. Further studies revealed temporally controlled DNA sliding of helicase-loading intermediates and that the first sliding complex includes ORC, Mcm2-7, and Cdt1. We demonstrate that sequential events of DNA unbending, Cdc6 release, and sliding lead to a stepwise decrease in ORC stability on DNA, facilitating ORC dissociation from its strong binding site during site switching. In addition, the controlled sliding we observed provides insight into how ORC accesses secondary DNA-binding sites at different locations relative to the initial binding site. Our study highlights the importance of dynamic protein–DNA interactions in the loading of two oppositely oriented Mcm2-7 helicases to ensure bidirectional DNA replication.

Eukaryotic DNA replication must occur exactly once per cell cycle to maintain cell ploidy. This outcome is ensured by temporally separating replicative helicase loading (G1 phase) and activation (S phase). In budding yeast, helicase loading is prevented outside of G1 by cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) phosphorylation of three helicase-loading proteins: Cdc6, the Mcm2-7 helicase, and the origin recognition complex (ORC). CDK inhibition of Cdc6 and Mcm2-7 is well understood. Here we use single-molecule assays for multiple events during origin licensing to determine how CDK phosphorylation of ORC suppresses helicase loading. We find that phosphorylated ORC recruits a first Mcm2-7 to origins but prevents second Mcm2-7 recruitment. The phosphorylation of the Orc6, but not of the Orc2 subunit, increases the fraction of first Mcm2-7 recruitment events that are unsuccessful due to the rapid and simultaneous release of the helicase and its associated Cdt1 helicase-loading protein. Real-time monitoring of first Mcm2-7 ring closing reveals that either Orc2 or Orc6 phosphorylation prevents Mcm2-7 from stably encircling origin DNA. Consequently, we assessed formation of the MO complex, an intermediate that requires the closed-ring form of Mcm2-7. We found that ORC phosphorylation fully inhibits MO complex formation and we provide evidence that this event is required for stable closing of the first Mcm2-7. Our studies show that multiple steps of helicase loading are impacted by ORC phosphorylation and reveal that closing of the first Mcm2-7 ring is a two-step process started by Cdt1 release and completed by MO complex formation.

Free-living bacteria have regulatory systems that can quickly reprogram gene transcription in response to changes in the cellular environment. The RapA ATPase, a prokaryotic homolog of the eukaryotic Swi2/Snf2 chromatin remodeling complex, may facilitate such reprogramming, but the mechanisms by which it does so are unclear. We used multiwavelength single-molecule fluorescence microscopy in vitro to examine RapA function in the Escherichia coli transcription cycle. In our experiments, RapA at <5 nM concentration did not appear to alter transcription initiation, elongation, or intrinsic termination. Instead, we directly observed a single RapA molecule bind specifically to the kinetically stable post termination complex (PTC)—consisting of core RNA polymerase (RNAP)-bound sequence nonspecifically to double-stranded DNA—and efficiently remove RNAP from DNA within seconds in an ATP-hydrolysis-dependent reaction. Kinetic analysis elucidates the process through which RapA locates the PTC and the key mechanistic intermediates that bind and hydrolyze ATP. This study defines how RapA participates in the transcription cycle between termination and initiation and suggests that RapA helps set the balance between global RNAP recycling and local transcription reinitiation in proteobacterial genomes.